It is an HONOUR and a PRIVILEGE to share
THE NEW WORLD ORDER
F.S. MARVIN (Ed); 1932
“This book is based on lectures delivered at two Unity History Schools, one at Danzig in 1929, the other at Stockholm in 1931. The subject under discussion on both occasions was much the same, the history of the world since the War, with special stress on the growth of world co-operation… the general topics of education, the contact of races and the world-treatment of industry and finance, which are the most urgent problems of the day.”
Please print these files, in case anything ‘happens’ to this blog, its author or the source text.
(Please note: I share this book in the interests of Free Speech, Research and Truth-Seeking. It does not imply that I agree with everything in this book, and please keep in mind it was written by Europeans in the 1930′s.)
I will attempt to write short summaries of the chapters of this book in future posts; but for now, I’d like to make these overarching observations and appraisal of the book’s contents. The timing and the title of the book raise profound issues concerning the motives of its authors.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER: GOOD OR EVIL?
Have you been through the same dilemma as me? A swinging pendulum between knowing, and not knowing, what and who is good or evil? To the point where you feel you are going insane?
The New World Order (NWO) has a bad name; it is the epitome of evil and has become the road-map for totalitarian tyranny. Was it intended to be this way? What were the motives of the creators of the original New World Order? Is the demonism of the New World Order justified, and was it an accident or by design?
Maybe I’m naive? Maybe I too easily look for the good in people? But, perhaps it is time to re-open and re-examine the work of the original exponents of a new world order, forgive them for their 1930’s cultural idiosyncrasies, and listen to the spirit of what they said and the motivations behind their words. I am not convinced they were the evil people we believe them to be. I see a recurring pattern that makes me skeptical of the modern view of the New World Order and slow to judge the early visionaries of a new world order.
A RECURRING PATTERN
The El-ites have a clear modus operandi:
Take every good and benign idea, and profit from it; take every good-intentioned organisation and infiltrate it in order to destroy or control it.
It seems to me, that the vision of a new world order, along with many other free-thinking ideologies, has been hijacked, bastardised and demonised by the El-ites of their day; and always, on every occasion, because it threatens the very core of the El-ites’ power and authority.
Let me offer a few examples of ‘the many others’, in chronological order, to show you what I mean…
GOVERNMENT: Was there once a time (perhaps a ‘Golden Age’) when governance, leadership, perhaps even ‘God-ship’, over the people of the Earth was benign, respectful, loving and in balance with Nature (as brutal as it can sometimes be)? By way of example: a little like the aboriginal tribes of North America, the Amazon, Africa and Australia; who survived for thousands of years with their form of leadership and government in balanced relationship with Nature and their neighbours? When did we become slaves?
JUDAH-ISM: Originally an-archic (no-ruler) nomads, but changed after contact with Egyptian imperialists. Then, later, infiltrated by Khazarian/Maccabean ‘converts’: the ‘jews’ who give Judaism a bad name.
THE WAY (of Christ): An an-archic (no-ruler) ideology that was later (4thC) bastardised into ‘Christianity‘ and dominated by the religious El-ites that had taken over from the political El-ites of the Roman imperialists (i.e. Holy Roman Church).
ISLAM: A warrior-like defence of a peace-loving ideology under threat from the religious imperialism of the Roman empire; later infiltrated by literalist misogynists of Arabia.
THE MAGI: I use this term to encompass all HERMETIC traditions (including those above) such as, FREEMASONRY (infiltrated and brought under governance/control in the 18th C), and the ILLUMINATI (a term that merely means ‘enlightened’ but was infiltrated and politicised, again around the 18th C); both of which were originally founded in personal alchemy of turning one’s soul from the electro-magnetically (light) insulating ‘lead’, into a purified ‘golden’ being of light and love. Unfortunately, the El-ites took this spiritual concept literally, (and therein lies one of the roots of today’s problems!).
AMERICAN, FRENCH and RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONS: All these revolutions happened following an increasing enlightenment of the people which was allowed to enrage the lower ‘slave’ classes into revolt that could then be brought under control by greater authoritarian intervention and rule. Once the ‘peasants’ had revolted, the middle-class intelligentsia, who had become enlightened and understood the ruse, were then eliminated.
COMMUNE-ISM: A peaceful, but non-compliant rebellion against the pervading class structure based on communities working together in co-operatives to take power away from the ruling El-ite classes. Infiltrated, politicised and commercialised by profiteering corporate El-ites who turned commune-ism into anti-free-market trade practises that favoured the avaricious.
JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES: Initially, an amalgamation of Bible student groups who encouraged independent Bible study and exposed ‘religion as a snare and a racket.’ Infiltrated and commercialised by the second president, J.F. Rutherford, who brought in regulation and conformity to state laws by using the law to assert their right to ‘freedom to worship’ and proselytise . Their ideology attracted many people disillusioned with the political ramifications of Communism and mainstream religion. They too, used the terms ‘New World Order’ and even their translation of the Bible is called ‘The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures’.
So, now we come to the New World Order. From reading the book with the same title, and from reading other social writers of the era (e.g. H.G. Wells), it seems to me that the middle-class intelligentsia of the 1920’s and 30’s (following the end of WWI) saw clearly the tyrannical forces at work in their world and had witnessed the callous and inhuman activity of psycho-sociopaths that made up the banking El-ites who had, through war and control of the money supply, plunged the western world into debt and thereby enslaved whole nations and blackmailed the democratically elected representatives of the people.
The free-thinkers of the early years of the 20th century saw the need for a new world order, with humanitarianism as its core value and brotherly co-operation across all national boundaries. Again, this wonderful and enlightened idea of a new world order was hijacked and bastardised by the industrial and banking El-ites who saw this as a challenge to their authority that they could turn it into an opportunity for ultimate control. Our basic human need to co-operate and live freely and harmoniously together has been used against us by infiltrating any organisation or group that lives by these principles and gaining control of them. As Tobias Churton makes plain (talking about the infiltration of Freemasonry in the 18th century, but relevant as a general principle of governance):
“Creating state-neutral, non-political new ‘orthodoxies’ has been a method of government control since ancient times. [How ancient?] Locate the perceived threat, then ‘turn it’ into an innocuous body by maintaining elements of its former attractiveness while taking the sting out of its potential to challenge elements of state policy and control…
“How would you go about neutralising the perceived threat? Infiltrate, dominate, transform and recruit, recruit, recruit.”
Freemasonry: The Reality; 2007; pg320,( 2009 edition)
Does this pattern of control not fit the fate of the New World Order?
I am fully aware that, when I read the contents of The New World Order, I may be being blinded by rhetoric and ‘spin’ in the same way that the Rockefeller Foundation dresses its draconian control agenda in ‘nice’ language that makes them sound like little philanthropic angels. But, I put it to you, dear reader, that the new world order envisioned by the contributors to The New World Order was, and is, not the same New World Order that the corporate El-ites have ‘infiltrated, dominated, transformed and recruited, recruited, recruited’ into the diabolical dragon that it is today.
As The New World Order shows, their New World Order was to be the product of The League of Nations. Interesting then, that the USA refused to join The League of Nations, and the Roman Catholic Church refused to endorse it; while the Jehovah’s Witnesses saw it as “a disgusting thing standing in a holy place”. Interesting too, that The League of Nations was sabotaged and destroyed, and along with it, the hope of the original New World Order, only to be replaced by the El-ites’ exact replica, the United Nations, built on land donated by the Rockefeller family, and interpreted by Jehovah’s Witnesses as “the image of the wild beast” of Revelation 13 that had a death-stroke and got healed; and yet, the Jehovah’s Witnesses applied for, and was granted, associate status as an NGO of the United Nations in 1992.
Read The New World Order and judge for yourselves whether the founding fathers of the New World Order have been demonised and misrepresented by the modern-day totalitarian, corporate-controlled, NWO traitors to the human race… or not?
Antithesis to this post: The History and Significance of the New World Order; Scott Spencer.
Earlier references to a new world order: Foundations of a new world order; Charles Richard Van Hise; League to Enforce Peace (U.S.); 1918
GOING DOWN IN HISTORY AS
THE SILENT EVOLUTION