The Urgent Case for a Ban on Fracking


A Report by Food and Water Watch

“We now use the term fracking to represent all that this
specific process of hydraulic fracturing entails. Allowing
more fracking means that oil and gas companies will
continue to:

• Fragment forests and mar landscapes with new
roads, well sites, waste pits and pipelines;
• Compete with farmers for local water supplies
while consuming millions of gallons of water for each
fracked well;
• Produce massive volumes of toxic and even
radioactive waste, the disposal of which is causing
earthquakes and putting at risk drinking water
• Cause thousands of accidents, leaks and spills
each year that threaten public health and safety and
put at risk rivers, streams, shallow aquifers and farms;
• Pump hazardous pollutants into the air, at the
expense of local communities, families and farms;
• Turn homes into explosive hazards by contaminating
water wells with methane and other flammable
• Put vital aquifers at risk for generations by
creating new pathways for the potential flow of
contaminants over the coming years and decades;
• Destabilize the climate on which we all depend
with emissions of carbon dioxide and methane and by
locking in future climate pollution with new oil and
gas infrastructure projects; and
• Disrupt local communities, with broad physical
and mental health consequences, increased demand
on emergency and other social services, damage to
public roads, declines in property value, increased
crime, and losses felt in established sectors of local

View full report HERE

Table of Contents

Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Water and Land Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Water consumption. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Impacts on surface waters, forests and soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Aquifer contamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Methane and other hydrocarbon gases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Hydrocarbon gases in aquifers as a sign of more problems to come . . . . . . . . . . 10
Earthquakes, Lightning Strikes and Exploding Trains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Air and Climate Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Silica dust. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
Byproducts from combustion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
The pollutants that oil and gas companies bring to the surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
Emissions are larger than officials estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Natural gas dependence causes more global warming than thought . . . . . . . . . . .18
Public Health, Economic and Social Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Ban Fracking and Usher in a Safe and Sustainable Energy Future . . . . . . . . . . . 22

EL-ITE BLOODLINES & THE JEWS: Co-conspirators to Pillage England


How Did England Become the Property Of the El-ite Bloodlines?

What Role Did the Jews Play?

There is clearly a parallel between The Domesday Book of the 11th Century and Agenda 21 of the 21st Century.  Both were/are a survey, on gargantuan scales, of every exploitable living thing to secure the ‘unalterable appropriation’ by an ascending power. What else can we learn from William the Conqueror’s conquering methods? 

William’s Co-conspirators

The following quotes are from ‘Magna Carta’s three Jewish clauses’ by Jonathan Romain; in ‘The Jewish Chronicle’, 4/5 Sept. 2014.

“It was then [late 11th Century] that William of Normandy brought over Jews from his French territory to help colonise his new kingdom.

“As Jews did not have a set place in this hierarchical chain, a niche had to be created for them, and their right of residence was made dependent on the will of the Crown. It was a two-way relationship: they being answerable directly to the king and the king being their protector.

“William encouraged Jewish migration here for two reasons. First, it was obviously useful having people who were both French speakers and loyal to him… Second, many of them performed a very useful economic function as moneylenders.

“With Christians being forbidden to enter such [usury] arrangements, here was an important economic vacuum.

“The barons… were appalled at how Jews were indirectly bolstering the power of the Crown at their expense.

What happened was that, if landowners could not pay their debts to the Jews, they forfeited the property they had put up as collateral. As Jews could not own land, this then reverted to their master, the king, who systematically built up his holdings. It meant that the Jews were accidental agents in a substantial land transfer to the king, and in increasing his powers nationally.”

Does all this sound familiar? History has a habit of repeating itself. So who is using the Jews,  in the 21st Century, to acquire the resources needed for an out-of-control population explosion, without the need to “…integrate [the] various domains into one empire, but instead continued to administer each part separately“?

I suggest you look East and into the eye of the tiger.









The Rothschild Empire knows it is in a state of downfall. Desperate to ward off foreclosure from the Chinese, it not only punishes the poor through ‘austerity’ measures, but is now attempting to rape Russia and Eastern Europe and pillage its wealth.

Pathetically, Eastern Europeans believe the illusion of prosperity and security in the West and are only too willing to throw their money into Rothschild’s black hole.

Here’s the game:


  • Create economic uncertainty through war in Eastern Europe.
  • Create an excuse to impose sanctions on Russia.


  • Lure Eastern European and Russian cash into the West.


  • Spend, spend, spend; keep the Chinese happy and enjoy the party while it lasts.

The Game in Action

Firstly, show your strength and might. Assassinate any leader who does not play by IMF & World Bank (Rothschild) rules, destroy their economy and create a central Rothschild bank : Indonesia, Iraq, Libya & Gaddafi, Syria, Iran.

Lure Eastern European states into the European Union with the promise of economic prosperity; threaten economic destruction if they don’t.

Stir up revolutions in countries that are divided on EU membership: Ukraine.

Create excuses for sanctions against Russia.

Get courts to impose heavy fines to scare investors: ‘Russia ordered to pay $50 billion over Yukos

Watch the money roll in from Eastern European and Russian investors:


But there is another agenda (one of many) in all this:

China, as the largest member of the BRICS nations, is biding its time and waiting patiently to take over the reins of World Power from the Colonial Empires. (There are pros and cons to this inevitable fact; but that’s another issue.) The Western oligarchs, of whom Rothschild is by no means the top oligarch, are aware of this and have a Scorched Earth policy.

The imposition of sanctions against Russia will be answered with sanctions of their own; namely, the withdrawal of oil and gas supplies from Eastern Europe & Russia. Not only will this drive up the price of oil and, therefore, the revenue into Rothschild coffers, but also create a climate of fear that will see brainwashed Western European people begging their governments to FRACK their land.

What will be left for our new Chinese ‘owners’ will be a desolate, resource-less, polluted, pillaged, post-industrial landscape.

Meanwhile, Israel will have cleared out the Palestinians from their land and created a bolt-hole for the Rothschilds and their cronies. Armed to the teeth with a nuclear arsenal big enough to destroy the whole planet, Rothschild and the Saudi Royals will threaten any neighbouring countries with annihilation should they dare to attack; and threaten the whole world with ‘Star Wars’ weapons should an international law court threaten to indict them.

Resistance may be futile; but establishing your own personal sovereignty is satisfying, character-building and cathartic. Perhaps your soul will be rewarded with greater responsibility in another dimension where you will be able to express your creativity?






Goodnight Malaysian 370: The OFFICIAL Conspiracy Theory


s372238209853599257_p23_i3_w320 (Photo source:

My suspicions of a conspiracy are heightened when books appear very soon after an event, together with an amount of mainstream media hype only available to high-profile authors. ‘GOODNIGHT MALAYSIAN 370’ claims to be ‘The Truth Behind the Loss of Flight 370’, but reeks of an official history and a cover–up of the cover-up:

So soon?

Books usually take years to be written and published before they appear in the bookshops. ‘Goodnight Malaysian 370’ is released on 30th July 2014; less than 21 weeks after the event.

In less than 21weeks (including collating, writing, editing, proofreading, typesetting, etc, etc) Geoff Taylor and Ewan Wilson claim to have:


The book is already being ‘promoted’ in mainstream news outlets: Sunday Express, Huffington Post, The Independent, International Business Times, The Daily Mail, New Zealand Herald, Indian Express; to name but a few.

World Exclusive?:

However… ‘Khan [pilot Zaharie’s brother-in-law] initially claimed the voice from the cockpit was not Zaharie’s, but then telephoned his sister Faizah who … confirmed the voice belonged to her husband.’ What changed his mind to change his story? What changed her mind to speak to a journalist? How much were they paid?

 The ‘official conspiracy theory’ hype:


Add to this that flight MH370 was carrying a cargo that included a large electrical device disguised as ‘a consignment of lithium-ion batteries.’ But ‘[p]ublished cargo records show neither the real shippers nor the real recipients.’

But the authors of ‘Goodnight Malaysian 370’ are sure about one thing (despite no evidence): ‘…it plunged into the Indian Ocean.’

As the holder of a pilot’s licence, I can assure you that a plane cannot disappear. A pilot who makes a Pan-Pan call will be told exactly where he/she is within seconds. A lost plane, no matter how small, is not just improbable, it is IMPOSSIBLE.

Worlds largest aircraft (Photo source: Nottingham Post)

So what happened to MH370? Did it end up at East Midlands Airport and then flown to Ukraine on July 13th?






Massive Hoax 17

Worlds largest aircraftNIGHT-TIME PICK-UP?

(Photo source: Nottingham Post)

At first it appeared to be a simple ‘false flag’ event. But there’s more to Massive Hoax 17 (MH17) than simply making it look like the ‘enemy’ shot a plane down. Apart from the media hype (one interviewee on Radio 4’s ‘The World Tonight’, Thurs 17/7/14, repeatedly ignored questions in order to repeat the mantra… ‘this is not only an act of terrorism, it’s a crime against humanity’), there are the ‘inconsistencies’ about the whole ‘drama’.

Firstly, there is the problem of ‘rebels’ having the capability to shoot down a plane at an altitude of 33,000ft (interesting number in itself, don’t you think?). To do so, would require, not only highly sophisticated weaponry, but also highly trained and technological operators; not the sort that could be launched by a man in a field with a bazooka over his shoulder. But that’s convenient, because it draws in a super-power such as the Russians.

Another convenient (un)truth is the fact that there are no bodies… “armed rebels took the bodies away from their workers by force.”

But there’s more, and this one hits closer to home (if you live in England)…

According to ‘vox’,

“Four Ukrainian military planes have been shot down since June. Two of those incidents appear to have almost certainly have been caused by rebels, apparently demonstrating that they have the ability and willingness to shoot down a plane. But the other two were shot down at high altitude, like the MH17 flight was, and it’s not nearly as clear who was responsible.”

Let’s take a look at a short timeline:

The Fishy bits…

  • The AN-30 and the Il-76 were shot down from a ‘low’ altitude (low enough for a MANPADS missile to hit, ie: below 11,500).
  • The AN-26 and flight MH17 were out of range for a shoulder –fired missile. Either a more sophisticated surface-to-air missile, or perhaps an air-to-air missile from a fighter plane, brought down the AN-26.
  • The AN-225 is THE biggest aircraft in the world, with a maximum take-off weight of 640 tonnes!

My question is this… what was loaded on to the biggest airplane in the world at East Midlands Airport and flown to the Ukraine? Parts of a Malaysian Airlines’ Boeing 777? The same aircraft that ‘disappeared’ from radar over the Andaman Sea.

2993618,h=425,pd=1,w=620Does this ‘seat’ look like it hit the ground at ‘free-fall’ speed? Or does it look like it was ‘placed’ in a field? Where is the crater? Why hasn’t any ‘sharp’ parts penetrated the soft earth? Like a piece of marmalade on toast… strange how it landed with a bare(!) body underneath? (Source:

Woken Up Yet?






The El-ites II: Who Are The El-ites?

Know Thy Enemy.

(Sun Tzu; Art Of War.)

I want to take you into the minds of the El-ites. Not a pretty place, I know, but someone has to go there; and, as they say, you can’t see darkness without shining a light into it.


As Sun Tzu stated, ‘know they enemy’ is imperative if we are to avoid ‘a hundred dangers’ and fight this war of attrition that has lasted for as long as the El-ites and their human slaves have been roaming this planet.


As I have written elsewhere, the El-ites genuinely believe that they are Gods, or descended from Gods, and that humans are their worker-slave race.

Who Are The El-ites?

Does society need an elite class?

When does Elitism become a problem?

Who were the El-ites?

Who are today’s El-ites?

What is The Third Revolution?

Where are the modern-day El-ites recruited from?

What unifies the El-ites?

What dangers do we face from the El-ites?

What can be done to avoid a ‘pessimistic finale’?

“RESILIENCE”: The New Buzzword of the Great Conspirators

The resilience of neoliberal urbanism (Tom Slater)

I too, had noticed that ‘RESILIENCE’ was becoming the new buzzword of the Great Conspirators, led by the Rockefeller Foundation, in their perpetration of Agenda 21. Expect to hear this word more often in the MSM (Mainstream Media).

“Resilience, the latest urban policy and think tank buzzword extolled upon the world’s urban dwellers, operates as an insidious alias to dispossession and territorial stigmatisation.”

This is an excellent article by Tom Slater, Reader in Urban Geography at the University of Edinburgh. Here are a few more choice quotes from the article. (Click here to see the full version.)

“The steer is towards a particular vision, that of the gentrifying city embraced by policy elites enamoured with pseudo-intellectuals… a humanising vision for cities without any acknowledgement of the disruptive and cookie-cutter gentrification that such a vision has unleashed all over the world.”


This is the latest policy and think tank abomination to infect and paralyse the study of cities, to the extent that it has become a research funding council priority all over the world.”

“… it is no coincidence that an entire cottage industry on “resilient cities” has emerged at a time of global austerity (a needless and wicked political and corporate assault on the poor that needs to be captured as a crisis per se, rather than as a response to an economic crisis).  The insidious work of urban resilience lies in the obvious and, to its proponents entirely logical policy suggestion the word carries: “urban dwellers of the world, brace yourselves for austerity [or environmental catastrophe] and everything will be fine in the end!”  Recently Julian Reid  tweeted a photograph of a poster which, in a beautiful act of resistance, perfectly captures the symbolic power of the anaesthetising spell of resilience:

A poster in New Orleans, blogged here.

Speaking about the Rockefeller Foundation‘s 100 Resilient Cities initiative, Tom interprets its aims as:

“prizes to the cities that rack up points in respect of getting back to the desired status quo of capital accumulation and elite wealth capture as quickly as possible.”

“In the UK it is currently being embraced and pushed by deeply conservative ‘good-design-can-save-us’ organisations such as The Prince’s Foundation for Building Community and Create Streets…  In reality, they advocate the creation of self-absorbed, clap-happy zones proudly celebrating how handpicked social housing tenants – a minority – are hidden behind a sterile vernacular of Quality Street, neo-Georgian facades. Those behind the scenes, extracting value from the hysterical panic of a ‘housing shortage’ whilst ignoring the existence of nearly 1 million empty homes in the UK, call themselves ‘placemakers’ without the least hint of irony or even squeamishness.”

“Resilience so easily supports not only austerity, but the territorial stigmatisation that so often precedes strategies of dislocation (“that community is just not resilient enough, so we need to break it up and scatter its residents”).

“… when the shadowy urban ‘experts’ talk of “resilient cities”, there is a symptomatic silence over the… relentless quest for profit from land and real estate, usually achieved via violent land grab and forced eviction.”

He concludes:

“Neoliberal urbanism has proved to be extraordinarily resilient, and the most “resilient community” of all appears to be that of a cartel of politicians and financial executives, aided by think tanks and philanthropic organisations, who have “bounced back” (to take the language used in the Guardian) from a crisis they created with even more violence and venom towards marginalised citizens (who they treat as the culprits)….

We are not resilient.”